Most founders hire on gut feel. They meet someone who seems smart, confident, and likeable — maybe they've worked at a recognisable company — and they make an offer. Six months later, the person is underperforming, the team is frustrated, and the founder is asking why they thought this was a good idea.

Bad hiring isn't bad luck. It's a bad process. The WHO method — developed by Geoff Smart and Randy Street, used by some of the most systematic hirers in business — replaces gut feel with a structured approach that significantly increases your hit rate.

"Hiring is the most important thing you do. It's also the thing most founders do worst."

Step 1: The Scorecard

Before you write a job description, write a scorecard. A scorecard defines what you actually need someone to achieve — not what you want them to do day to day, but what success looks like in the role after 12 months.

A good scorecard has three components:

The scorecard drives every other part of the process. If you can't define what good looks like, you can't hire for it.

Step 2: Source Aggressively

Job boards are a last resort, not a first step. By the time a great candidate is on a job board, they've either already been hired or they're in multiple processes and your offer has to compete on price.

WHO-method sourcing means:

The goal is to have 10+ candidates at the top of the funnel before you start interviewing. If you're moving to close on fewer than that, you're making a choice on limited information.

Step 3: The Structured Interview

The WHO interview has a specific structure: a career walkthrough that starts at the beginning and works chronologically through every role.

For each role in their history, ask:

The power of this approach is that patterns emerge across a career that a single-role interview misses. Someone who always blames the company when things go wrong. Someone whose "accomplishments" are always team achievements with no personal accountability. Someone who leaves every role within 18 months when it gets hard.

You're also listening for specifics. Great candidates talk in specifics. Weak candidates talk in generalities. "I increased pipeline by 40%" versus "I really helped the team perform better." Which one do you want?

Red Flags That Most Founders Ignore

The Reference Check (That Actually Tells You Something)

Most reference checks are useless because candidates choose their references and everyone knows they'll be positive. The WHO method fixes this: ask the candidate for references and then ask their references for other people who knew them well. You're looking for the reference of a reference — someone with no reason to be polished.

Ask references: "On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate their performance?" Nobody says 10 about anyone. When they say 7, ask "What would make them a 9?" You'll get the honest answer.

Hiring well is a learnable skill. Most founders get good at it only after making enough bad hires to finally take it seriously. The WHO method compresses that learning curve — and at a stage where one bad hire can genuinely derail six months of progress, that matters.

GT
Gary Thompson
Gary Thompson has been in the thick of running businesses since 2000 — 26 years as founder, operator, and coach. He specialises in helping B2B SaaS founders build their first scalable sales team.